AI providers and deployers
Teams bringing an AI system to market or using one in a regulated workflow, with responsibilities that need to be made explicit.
AI Act / evidence-led assurance
AI Act only
A scoped service covering only the AI Act framework: system role and use, evidence and gaps, and a decision brief.
The engagement starts with your real system, role, use case and operating jurisdictions—not with a generic compliance label.
AI Act / evidence-led assurance
14 jurisdictions as a conversation starter, not a coverage promise.
1404 / Reference perimeter
Our public matrix brings together reference sources, language notes and open gaps across 14 jurisdictions. It helps frame the questions for an engagement; it does not promise coverage, approval or a conclusion for every organisation.
Commercial terms
USD 750 per month
Month-to-month renewal. You may choose not to renew the following month.
Request the review01 / Who it is for
For teams moving from uncertainty to accountable action.
The service is designed for organisations operating across markets, products or teams where AI responsibilities need a shared, reviewable frame.
Risk, legal and compliance leaders
Owners who need a structured view of role, risk, documentation, human oversight and the questions requiring legal interpretation.
Product, security and procurement teams
People who need to connect technical controls, vendor evidence and operational decisions before an assurance conversation.
02 / What you receive
A clear working set of evidence and next decisions.
The output is shaped around the system in scope and the evidence available. Open questions remain visible instead of being replaced with assumptions.
AI Act perimeter brief
A concise view of system purpose, actors, intended use, affected people, dependencies and the assumptions that shape the review.
Evidence and gap map
A source-linked register of policies, records, controls, tests and missing artefacts that should be clarified for the scoped question.
Prioritised action roadmap
Practical next checks, accountable owners and a sequence for deciding what to remediate, document or discuss with specialist counsel.
03 / Included documents
The agreed outputs, made explicit.
The service includes working documents tied to the agreed AI Act question. They are evidence-led outputs, not a certificate or an approval.
AI Act perimeter brief
A written record of the system, role, intended use, affected context and agreed review boundary.
Evidence and gap map
A traceable working map of supplied evidence, open gaps and questions that remain dependent on facts or specialist interpretation.
Decision brief and action roadmap
A concise decision-oriented summary with prioritised next actions and owners, based on the agreed scope.
04 / Updates and dependencies
Follow-up is scoped, not assumed.
No automatic recurring update cadence is included by default. Follow-up work depends on newly supplied evidence, changes to the agreed system or use, and a separately confirmed scope.
Evidence-led follow-up
Updates can address new facts, documents or system changes only when the follow-up scope and timing are agreed.
Client inputs remain dependencies
The quality and timing of any update depend on access to current facts, records, responsible owners and relevant jurisdictions.
05 / Exclusions
What AI Act only does not include.
The service stays limited to the agreed AI Act perimeter and does not expand into a general compliance engagement.
Legal advice or representation
Legal advice, legal opinions, representation and final interpretation remain outside this service.
Certification, accreditation or approval
The service does not certify, accredit or secure regulatory approval for a system or organisation.
Other standards or out-of-scope work
NIST, ISO, NIS2 and other frameworks, plus work outside the agreed system, role, use or jurisdictions, are excluded.
03 / Cross-border value
One evidence story across different operating realities.
For organisations that operate across borders, an AI Act review is more useful when it makes differences in roles, language, records and local context visible without pretending they are interchangeable.
- A shared vocabulary for product, risk, security, legal and procurement teams.
- A traceable way to separate common controls from jurisdiction-specific questions.
- A practical hand-off between central governance and local operating owners.
1404 / Reference perimeter
14 jurisdictions as a conversation starter, not a coverage promise.
Our public matrix brings together reference sources, language notes and open gaps across 14 jurisdictions. It helps frame the questions for an engagement; it does not promise coverage, approval or a conclusion for every organisation.
View the public jurisdiction matrixImportant limits
This service supports scoping and evidence discussions. It is not legal advice, a certification, an accreditation or regulatory approval, and every engagement remains dependent on its system, facts and jurisdictional analysis.
Next step / scoped conversation
Start with the question your organisation needs answered.
Use the pre-assessment for a structured first pass, or contact us with the system, markets and evidence questions that matter to your team.